The Revolution

A Forum for Radical Political Change

When the Left is right and the Right is wrong

Posted by timpj5 on September 23, 2009

Those of you who know me or who have ever read this blog know that I am no Progressive. I have been in many an argument/discussion with liberals on issues from health care reform to abortion, taxes to the role of government. But I can’t be silent any more and be party to the ridiculousness of what many “conservatives” are doing. Years ago I would have considered myself a conservative… I’ve since grown older and, I hope, wiser in the process. Here’s why:

While I make no bones about my frustration and ideological differences with the current administration and majority party of Congress, the “dissent” from the other side of the aisle on issues ranging from health care reform to cap and trade to government expansion lacks a modicum of credibility. I, myself, am a firm believer in the limitations of the federal government not on in size and scope, but also in authority and jurisdiction. I originally supported George W. Bush based on the platform of federalism and a humble foreign policy as well as strict constructist Supreme Court judicial nominees. But when the light of truth was shined on the policies of the former president, the platform had been replaced with something entirely different. I could no longer support the policies of the president in regards to the expansion of Medicare liabilities, the expansion of the Department of Education, the continued support for nation building in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the inability to enact meaningful tax, tort and social security reform… 3 of the primary underpinnings of his platform.

Over the last 8 years, “conservatives” have idly sat by and watched as the “conservative” Republicans ran up the Federal deficit, nearly doubled federal spending and intervened, without respect for the constitution, in the affairs of sovereign nations on American’s dime. “Conservatives” watched as American’s civil liberties were diminished by unnecessary articles in the Patriot Act and government surveillance projects all the while condemning Democrats for “hating” America and being “weak” on defense. And at the core of the issues was the defense of the “American” way.

But now, with a Liberal Democrat in the White House, “conservatives” have decided that NOW federal spending is out of control and government is getting too intrusive. “Conservatives” now decry President Obama on every issue from health care reform to cap and trade to the foreign policy tactics with Iran and Israel to his use of a teleprompter for public address. This has to stop.

The President delivered several addresses this week, 1 to the G20 environment summit and another to the United Nations. While I disagree with many of the President’s policies, not everything he says is wrong.  Conservatives continue to criticize Obama as being weak on national defense and yet he has continued many of the policies of the Bush administration in regard to foreign policy and even increased activity in the war in Afghanistan.   You can’t have it both ways… either Bush was wrong or now Obama is right.

President Obama’s preference for diplomacy, even with rogue nations, rather than his affinity for military battering ram has been criticized ad nauseum by conservatives ever since he started running for President.  However, Obama is not alone in his affinity for diplomacy, he is accompanied by the likes of guys named Washington and Jefferson.  Not involving ourselves militarily in every conflict throughout the world is not a sign of weakness but rather of wisdom.

Those who call for American military action in Iran or North Korea would prefer to ignore the constitution and replace it with an Emperor.  The American military is not tool of politicians to effect change throughout the world, but a great deterrent to anyone who wishes the American people harm.  Those who criticized Bill Clinton for his interventionist policies in Bosnia and Somalia are the same ones who cheered George Bush for his interventionism in Iraq and Afghanistan and who would see us attack anyone else who doesn’t do what “we” say.  Something is missing… it’s called credibility.  Many conservatives now remind me of Keith Olbermann shouting down George Bush and his administration, lots of passion very little credibility.  You can criticize a position, a policy or a vote, but make sure you’re not just criticizing because of the letter that follows the name in parentheses.

Democrats and Republicans seem to determine their platforms based upon what the other is for or against and then doing the opposite.  Suffice to say that no political party has cornered the market on the truth.  In fact, if any major political party has even a little bit of it I’d be surprised.  But I’m big enough to say when those I normally would agree with are wrong.  I’m not going to join the Progressive Democratic party bandwagon, but I’m also not going to criticize them for how they comb their hair or how they throw a baseball.  There are very few issues I agree with modern Progressives on but when I do, I can acknowledge it.  If only Republicans and Democrats could do that too…

7 Responses to “When the Left is right and the Right is wrong”

  1. felsputzer said

    I’ve recently noticed that when someone criticizes Obama by quoting really leftist positions without any support — and I ask for some thought & consideration of the issues rather than name-calling — I am dismissed as an Obama fan. Like I’m a rock star groupie who can’t see anything but the starlight. So I’ve started mentioning my own well-thought out criticism first (usually Guantanamo still being open) and voia! I don’t get dismissed out of hand anymore. Sad, really, that people can’t assume I’m a rational reasoning human being until I prove it.

  2. timpj5 said

    Probably because there are more of the people you’re describing than people like you… too many side-taking, quote-repeating parrots and not enough critical-thinkers.

  3. Mark Baird said

    The “others” are destroying all that is good in the world.

  4. Marcellus said

    Interesting article, but dated, why did you stop writing and what are your thoughts on the current republican field?

    • timpj5 said

      Marcellus, thanks for reading. Yeah, I’ve been busy lately and haven’t really been able to comment on the current slate of Republican candidates. Frankly, with the exception of Ron Paul, I find the entire field lacking credibility. Maybe as things narrow down a little bit, I’ll find some time to excoriate the sad lot of them… but for now, thanks for reading.

      I’ll try to start getting something out there periodically…

  5. Brandon said

    For most recent news you have to pay a visit internet and on internet
    I found this web site as a best web site for
    most up-to-date updates.

  6. “Democrats and Republicans seem to determine their platforms based upon what the other is for or against and then doing the opposite. ”

    You’ve made a good case in this article that the Republicans are reflexively opposing everything this Democratic president is trying to do. Here, you fall back on the familiar refrain of “they both do it”. That’s not what I’ve seen: it seems to me that the Democrats, for better or worse, have an actual agenda. Only the Republicans have been deciding their course by reflexive opposition.

    If you’re going to assert that the Dems also arrive at their positions by reflexive opposition to the Republicans, perhaps you could provide some examples?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: